|
So What Am I Doing Wrong?

For many years before the darts ‘explosion’
of the 1970s and 1980s, advice on how to play the game appeared simple and
straightforward. Players adopted a standard stance, stood rock solid still and
never moved along the oche. The likes of England’s Eric Bristow, Wales’
Ceri Morgan and Scotland’s Jocky Wilson changed all that. In this article, first
published in Darts World in 1984, Mat Coward considers the changes
but still has to ask himself
SO WHAT AM I DOING WRONG?
The massive television coverage of the late
1970s and early 1980s brought vast changes to our game: the big companies are
falling over each other to offer sponsorships of players and events, the huge
sums available in prize money and exhibition fees, the creation of a tiny elite
of pros earning £100,000 a year. Those are just a selection of the more obvious
ways in which the simple art of arrow-chucking has come of age in these
commercial times.
But a change has taken place at grass-roots
level which is, perhaps, even more radical, although it has gone largely
unnoticed.
When I started playing darts – less than a
decade ago, just at the start of the big TV era – there seemed to be a right
way of going about the job. There was a right way to throw, a right
way to stand, a right way to finish. Not everyone could do it of
course, but everyone knew what it was.
Older darts players would coach beginners on
that basis; the understanding that there were right and wrong grips; stances and
so on. Even when the ‘coach’ was already a weaker player than his ‘pupil’, his
right to play the role of tutor went unquestioned simply because he’d been
playing the game longer and therefore had one thing of immense value that the
novice couldn’t possibly possess: he had The Knowledge.
What did this orthodoxy consist of?
Well, for a start there was the stance:
right foot pointing towards the bull, left foot behind at 45 degrees, body
leaning in. Then the throw: the golden rule of which was that only the throwing
arm from elbow to wrist moves during lift-off. Apart from that, you’re rigid as
a statue. The grip of course was another part of the game that everyone knew
had to be handled in one particular way.
There was also a smattering of lesser rules,
the most memorable - and in my mind the most inexplicable and pointless - of
which was “never move on the oche”. Books are still sold that contain this
wonderful piece of advice. But just are you supposed to do when your
first or second dart blocks your shot? Stand there like a petrified lemon and
watch with satisfaction as you next dart bounces off the flight of your last?
And there were rules governing finishing.
People still publish from time to time a list of suggested checkouts, and these
can be very useful to bad counters like myself. But up until recently it was as
if there was only one legally possible move for every number from 170 down to
40! In my local I recently finished a game in the way that I found most
comfortable and easiest and one old bloke (who, you notice, was watching and not
playing) went into apoplexy. “With two darts in your hand you can’t possibly go
any other way except…” He said it several times: “You can’t possibly…”
as if what I’d just done really was physically impossible.
And of course the big rule of finishing
was: Bulls are for Cowboys.
This darting conservatism must have lasted
for decades. But then telly came along, and suddenly the gaff was blown. Almost
overnight, millions of young darters realised that they had been had, and that
the rules laid down by the public bar professionals in about 1066 didn’t turn
you into a real professional. For the first time on a large scale it
became obvious that the great achievers in darts – as in just about everything
else – made their own rules.
You don’t have to look any further back than
this year’s Embassy to see how true that is. Look - if you can bear to - at Ceri
Morgan’s throw. Arms whirling about like a windmill, his whole body jerking with
the impact of every throw. And yet Morgan the Miller plays for his country – he
hits things, and more often than not they’re the things he’s going for.
Or look at the Boss himself.
You may have been too busy marvelling at
Bristow’s inability to throw anything but maximums to notice the way his back
foot leaps up when he releases his arrows. Mine used to do that when I first
started. Mind friends used to help me by standing on my left toes while I was
practicing. It worked eventually, and at least I’ll never be called up – I now
have one completely flat foot. But, all things considered, it doesn’t seem to do
Eric a lot of harm does it?
Finally, take John Lowe – the man many of us
still think of as the Master. The classic stylist, perfect stance, smooth
release, the lot. But even he, like just about all the pros, slides up and down
the oche like an ice-skater when he’s after an angle.
No, there’s no doubt about it, “textbook
darts” is dead. The teenagers starting up today are more like to take tips from
watching Cliff [Lazarenko] or Jocky on the box, than from studying a
teach-yourself manual. Maybe, if they’re very lucky, they’ll even develop their
own style, to do what comes naturally and easily to them, and I have no doubt
that they’ll be better players for it.
But on the whole I don’t regret the
discipline I was taught: there’s no denying that - though I says it as
I shouldn’t - after a few years’ practice I do have a near-perfect stance
and not-bad throw. I don’t actually hit anything, but it’s nice to watch.
So tell, Orthodoxians, I challenge you:
why can’t I play as well as the Big E, when I’m doing everything right and he’s
doing half of it wrong?
© 1984 Mat Coward
Mat’s website:
http://homepages.phonecoop.coop/matcoward/

Historian’s Note:
I’m hardly in a position to comment on Mat’s
article.
At the time wrote his article (1984) I was
certainly not an ‘orthodoxian’. I used to throw my darts with my left hand but
line up and aim each dart with my right eye and throw each dart in an arc across
the body. Diane Paul, an expert in ‘handedness’, mentioned my darts-throwing
action in her book Living Left-handed published by Bloomsbury in 1990.
She wrote that I was ‘a mixed lateral by all accounts.’
England’s Bobby George plays very well
indeed throwing in a similar way, although with his right hand, yet he’s a top
player and I, well… I’m a pub player of mixed ability. I informed Bobby one day
that he was a mixed lateral. He paused, looked at me, grinned and said “Yeah.
Right” and continued his game of darts.
However, some years ago I suffered from
‘dartitis’ and cured the condition by correcting my throw so that I lined the
dart up with my left eye. It was difficult to make such a major change but I
succeeded. Mind you, I still play rubbish but, like Mat, hit the things I aim
at occasionally.
Mat’s absolutely right about the ‘standard
rules’ of grip, stance and throw. Darters before the 1970s did appear to be set
in their ways and it seemed a rigid law that there was a correct way to
throw a dart and any number of incorrect ways. In the early 1950s, East Anglian
darts champion George Caley wrote of the stance
‘…stand rock-firm. Don’t flex the knees. Don’t move the head.
Don’t move the shoulders. Don’t lean forward. Don’t crane the neck. Don’t sway
from the hips. Don’t stoop. Don’t throw so that a jerk seems to run through the
body. Don’t rise on your heels.’
Put simply George was saying ‘Stand firmly
from start to finish of your throw and move only the forearm and hand of the
throwing arm.’
However, on the point Mat raised about
movement along the oche (or ‘hockey’ as it was in George’s day) he wrote
‘Personally, I do not see much advantage in this’, preferring ‘if my first dart
covers up the treble 20 badly, to come right away from there and throw for the
treble 19’. George qualified his advice by saying ‘I think it is a disadvantage
to break the natural rhythm of your throwing by moving to a new position’ adding
finally, ‘And what is the difference in score? – only three after all.’ I think
that last comment says it all to the modern player! However, George’s book
How to Improve Your Darts was a top seller in its day and many would have
followed George’s ‘golden rules’.
In his book, Caley’s methods more or less
confirm Mat’s view that the rules were rigid in the days before the TV darts
boom. However, alternatively, here are some wise words from dual News of the
World winner, the late great Tom Barrett, who in the early 1970s wrote:
‘If the target is obscured by darts already in the board, I move
to the left or right. Many players criticize the idea of moving on the hockey,
but it seems to me that you must move if your target is obscured. By moving
slightly to one side or the other you can sometimes go ‘in off’ another dart as
in billiards. Once you have taken up your new position, however, you should
again remain perfectly balanced and still throughout the throw.’
So the advice was there for anyone
reading Tom’s book Darts which was published by Pan Books in 1973, but I
get Mat’s drift. I too learned my darts in a local boozer, with local boozers
and adopted a throwing action that often bemused and on occasion confused my
opponents. The fact that I also threw a set of brass Unicorn ‘Village’ darts,
shaped like beer bottles, probably did not help the development of a consistent,
winning style.
It will be interesting to learn whether or
not the rigidity of style of folks like George Caley (and others), which fell
out of fashion when the likes of Jocky, Eric and Ceri (and more recently
professionals such as Co Stompe) won hundreds of tournaments throwing ‘the wrong
way’, will return in the coaching methods adopted by the new darts academies
that are growing up across England today.
© Patrick Chaplin 2008

|